He’s a very different, even controversial dog trainer, who often works with the difficult cases.
Steve Walter is the founder of Nitro K-9. His training philosophy, which is based on European dog training underpinned by the concept of yin and yang, is the result of many years of working with dogs and refining multiple techniques from many different training systems.
Steve started training dogs in his teens, using traditional military techniques. In the early 90s, when reward-based training started becoming popular, he worked with dogs using both edible rewards and clicker/marker training. However, he quickly noticed that the results were erratic, and that there was an increase in unreliable and sometimes aggressive behavior.
At the time, he was also getting involved with many of the European dog clubs, including French Ring, Schutzhund, Mondio Ring, and K.N.P.V. While food was used in training, he noticed that it was totally different in application and response. None of the dogs had aggression issues (and these were dogs that were trained to bite). They didn’t jump on people or pull on the leash. And as he trained his oldest dog Isaiah in French Ring, he started seeing a real difference; there was a new desire to please, a new confidence … and a much greater bond.
Steve wanted to bring these professional results to his clients—everyday people with household dogs. He started exploring different training systems used both in the U.S., and in Europe, working together with many different dog trainers, and has taken the best parts of multiple systems. The result is a comprehensive training program that uses non-cruel and humane methods that result in bonding, mutual respect, and stellar (not to mention reliable) behavior.
Over the years, Steve has trained thousands of dogs (and their owners) using the Nitro Dog training system. He has rehabilitated hundreds of “red zone” dogs and hundreds more that food and clicker methods have failed. Nitro K-9 training is also successfully used for advanced training, whether sports, protection or scent work—not to mention regular dogs that just need better obedience training.
Here is a blog post that will give you some idea of how guest Stephen Walter of Nitro K-9 works — and the high-end of the dogs he works with:
Last week, a woman came for a consultation for her Schutzhund 3 working line GSD. She had bought the dog from Germany, was unequipped to handle him, and –no surprise—the dog had started lunging, barking, and snapping at people.
The owners came to see me because they had gone to a veterinary behaviorist and, again no surprise—what she recommended wasn’t working.
As far as I can tell, a lot of these people don’t have any experience actually working with dogs or even understand canine behavior outside a book– especially those who are drunk on positive Kool-Aid. They can’t even diagnose the simplest things correctly.
What they do—at least what THIS one does—is charge several hundred dollars to get a history from the owner and spend a few minutes observing the dog. Then they hand the owner a form letter diagnosis with recommendations.
I have stacks of these form letters from people who end up coming to Nitro K9. They’re pretty much all the same. So, when I saw the report, I knew pretty much what to expect.
- Fear-based, protective, and territorial aggression and generalized anxiety.
- Cocktail of drugs: Fluoxetine (Prozac), Trazadone, and Clonidine.
- Muzzle training and crating. Presumably a SchH3 dog would be muzzle-trained already, but okay.
- Feel-good stuff for the human: Adaptil spray, a doggy music CD, a weighted backpack for walks, and puzzle toys to feed the dog from to “provide him with mental stimulation and an appropriate outlet.”
- Complete solitary confinement kit: Happy Hoodie, Mutt Muffs, and a ThunderCap. Not just one—all three.
- A garbled mess of “positivity”: The usual stuff—like never say no to the dog, teach the dog to “look at me” with food, and detailed, ineffective counter conditioning methods.
This is bad enough when it comes to Bob’s reactive doodle down the street. (They’re not helping pet dogs much either.) The problem is we’re talking about a working line GSD here—and one that has been trained to bite. This behaviorist is creating a liability, not solving problems. And the worst thing is that she doesn’t even know it.
Here’s what she didn’t do:
- Consider the role of breed and lines. Even with non-working lines, barking, lunging, and snapping are the behaviors we resolve in 9/10 of the GSD we see. This is very, very common. This dog most likely has some defensive or fear-based tendencies to start with. If you don’t understand why breed matters or the difference between lines, you have no business working with dogs. Period. This is why so many malinois are in rescue, why most GSD are basket cases. Positive people do not know how to raise these dogs.
- Recognize that she had no experience with working dogs. Protection, protection sport, police dogs all have higher drives that can make them quite neurotic if not managed and channeled properly. This is someone who is telling people to never say no to a dog that is trained to attack. At the very least, consult with a trainer/handler who has experience with these dogs. This is not a sign of weakness; this is due diligence.
- Assess the dog’s obedience. SchH3 requires a high level of training that includes obedience. She did not run the dog through what he knows, or explore how to use this obedience to resolve the issues. Instead, she attempted to address the issues—barking, lunging, snapping—in isolation. If the behaviorist knew he was trained to bite, why would she not use foundational obedience?
- Recommend that the owners learn the German commands. Here’s a dog that was shipped to new owners in a foreign country, where no one speaks the language he was taught. Why not handle the dog in the way the dog was trained, using correct vocal commands in the correct language, and with the correct leashwork. This is common sense.
- Overcome ideology for the sake of the dog. The force-free garbage runs strong with most veterinary behaviorists, with the usual positive language about “physical punishment” and “teaching the dog what to do instead.” Yet here’s a dog that is trained to a high level (not that she would know), almost certainly using a prong collar. Again—it comes back to someone treating a dog, without any knowledge of what she is doing.
When I saw the dog, he was depressed and lethargic, and frankly I think he was probably reacting because he didn’t understand what was expected of him, what was okay and not okay, etc. The owners were never instructed on how to handle him. These are common sense things that anyone with the slightest experience with dogs—much less a working dog—would recognize.
He was also so doped up he was practically cross-eyed. I put a prong on him, and ran him through the obedience. If you want to know the truth, I think the owners may have been scammed—but it’s hard to tell because he was pumped so full of meds. I will say that there’s no way this dog passed the courage test. However, he would train up beautifully.
I ended up giving the woman a couple other names in case she wanted a second opinion. Anyone with any working dog experience will tell her the same things I did. He was a nice dog. I’d like to see him off all the drugs and handled appropriately.
And I would really like to see fewer people going to veterinary behaviorists, even those who don’t have working line dogs.